By David N. Harding, Staff Writer
Though I’m not one to take homework assignments from friends who gladly take the label, NEVER-TRUMPER, I will however, take this assignment because I am so passionate about it. My mission here is not to attempt to do the impossible: change my friend’s mind on the subject.
My friend’s challenge:
“Detail in no uncertain terms, avoiding deflection, distraction, and "whataboutism" why you support an individual with no legal, moral, or ethical qualifications -- to represent the United States and its people, in what is arguably the most powerful position in the world. In that essay, explain what qualities of which he is possessed that ameliorates the crimes of which he has been convicted, the multiple cases of fraud of which he has been convicted, his long history of racism, sexual impropriety, dishonesty in both business and public life, the many proven instances of actions which would be considered treason, his disregard of the rule of law and constitutional primacy, and his clearly aggressive -- if not outright bizarre and imbecilic statements regarding the annexation of Canada, Greenland, and Mexico.”
My Response:
THE CASE FOR SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP
I will directly answer why I support Donald Trump as a leader of the United States despite his legal and ethical controversies. It will avoid deflection, distraction, and comparisons to other figures, focusing solely on his qualifications, policies, and leadership qualities.
1. LEADERSHIP AND EFFECTIVENESS
The presidency is ultimately about governance, policy, and results. Donald Trump’s tenure saw:
- A strong economy, with record-low unemployment across multiple demographics.
- Deregulation that empowers small businesses and job growth.
- Energy independence that reduced reliance on foreign adversaries.
- A commitment to border security and immigration reform.
- A foreign policy that prioritized American interests and established peace agreements.
These accomplishments directly benefited the American people and demonstrated his ability to lead effectively, even in the face of unprecedented opposition.
2. ADDRESSING THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL CONTROVERSIES
Your challenge suggests that legal convictions and allegations disqualify Trump from leadership. However, it is important to distinguish between the severity of legal actions and their implications on governance.
The legal cases against Trump involve interpretations of the law that have never been applied in the same way before. The convictions, while real, do not negate his ability to lead.
The accusations of fraud and dishonesty in business reflect aggressive business tactics but do not inherently diminish his effectiveness as a leader.
The accusations of racism are undermined by his past associations. Before entering politics, Trump was widely celebrated by prominent figures in the entertainment industry, civil rights organizations, and political circles, many of whom later turned against him. He donated millions to minority causes, received awards from black leaders, and was embraced by those who now denounce him. This shift raises legitimate questions about whether these accusations are based on principle or political expediency.
Allegations of sexual impropriety remain civil matters, not criminal convictions, and have not impacted his policy decisions. Claims of treasonous actions remain allegations without formal conviction under constitutional standards.
While these controversies may shape public perception, they do not erase his policy successes or his ability to act in the nation’s interest.
3. VERBAL STRATEGIES AND THE NATURE OF HIS RHETORIC
A unique aspect of Trump’s leadership is his rhetorical style, which is often misunderstood. His statements about annexing Canada, Greenland, and Mexico fall into a broader pattern of communication that serves several strategic purposes:
- Hyperbole as a Negotiation Tactic: Trump has a long history of using exaggerated statements to establish an extreme starting position before negotiating a more moderate outcome. By setting the bar high, he shifts public discourse and forces adversaries to respond on his terms.
- Distraction and Media Manipulation: His most controversial or bizarre statements often serve as distractions from more pressing policy initiatives. By dominating the news cycle with an outlandish remark, he can control media coverage and keep opponents off balance while advancing his real agenda behind the scenes.
- Testing Public and Political Reaction: Sometimes, his statements gauge reactions to ideas that may be unconventional but not entirely implausible. His mention of Greenland, for example, coincided with discussions about strategic Arctic positioning, an issue the U.S. government has since pursued more seriously.
Add comment
Comments